1. Entertainment

Discuss in my forum

'The Lacuna' by Barbara Kingsolver - Book Review

About.com Rating 3 Star Rating
User Rating 3 Star Rating (1 Review) Write a review

By , About.com Guide

'The Lacuna' by Barbara Kingsolver

'The Lacuna' by Barbara Kingsolver

HarperCollins

The Bottom Line

The Lacuna follows the life of Harrison Shepherd, a boy with an American father and Mexican mother who grows up in both countries, from 1929 - 1951. Although The Lacuna is presented as Shepherd's diaries and letters, he is not a very strong character in the novel. Indeed, The Lacuna is much more about what is happening in the world around Shepherd as he works for real historical figures. The history presented in The Lacuna is interesting, but the lack of intimacy and impetus in the main character makes the novel drag a little.

Pros

  • 'The Lacuna' makes history feel personal and interesting.

Cons

  • The novel lacks a central force to move it forward.

Description

  • 'The Lacuna' by Barbara Kingsolver was published in November 2009
  • Publisher: HarperCollins
  • 528 Pages

Guide Review - 'The Lacuna' by Barbara Kingsolver - Book Review

I liked The Lacuna mainly for the history it taught me and what it revealed about the actions of the U.S. government during the Great Depression and McCarthyism. I will admit up front that I am not a history student, and I knew nothing about Leon Trotsky, Diego Rivera or Frida Kahlo before reading The Lacuna. I found the novel to be an interesting way of learning about these figures and the history of Communism in Mexico. Although The Lacuna prompted me to do a little bit more Internet research on this area of history, I still do not feel confident saying whether Kingsolver's portrait of their lives was accurate.

As a story about a character -- Harrison Shepherd -- the novel lacked something. I think he remained too distant throughout the novel for the reader to truly be invested in his life. Also, the novel made sudden shifts in time and place, and it was sometimes hard to get back into the story after one of these changes.

I would recommend The Lacuna to those interested in Mexico or 20th century American history. I can see it being a worthwhile read for a high school class or a book club that wants to discuss some of the themes Kingsolver raises in depth. It is not, however, Kingsolver's best story.

User Reviews

 3 out of 5
Easy to read - false historical data, Member ahawiger

First admission - Lacuna was my first book by Barbara Kingsolver. It took me a while to get into it, because the characters and surroundings were so strange. As I followed Shepherd growth from boy to teenager and an distressed adult - I fully understood his fears, psychological scars, defensive life style, loneliness - all caused by his insensitive parents, homosexuality and a need for home. If Mrs Kingsolver would give as Shepperd and his world - I would say the book is excellent. However, as I red the book, I came upon pages after pages populated with well known historical figures and historical facts. We may separate these into two groups: The communists - Leon Trotsky and his family, Diego Rivera, famous muralist and Freda Kahlo painter and the wife of Diega; McCathyism or how the anti-communism went haywire destroying live of the hero. Communism is a subject I know a lot about, I lived in Soviet Union and Poland, witnessed fear of the entire nation and terror of prison and death. The book documentary figures Trotsky, Diego Rivera and Freda Kahlo were all member carrying communists. Trotski - as cruel as Stalin and Lenin despite his silk pyjamas, Diego and Kahlo - accomplished artists - used the art and their position to present Stalin empire as the future heaven for proletariat and proclaimimg the glory of the revolution. Mrs. Kingsolver fictionalized Trotsky, Diego and Kahlo, latter assuming a role of major heroine. If this book is fiction, shouldn't the author give these historical characters some assuming names? Because Trotsky in the book has nothing to do with historical Trotsky, same for Diego and Kahlo. The communism gets easy off. Yes Stalin is sinister character, he wants to kill Trotsky in his silk pyjamas which brings fear to the household. Is this the same Stalin that murdered 40 million of his compatriots? Is this the same Lenin that taught Stalin and Trotsky? Then history moves to US and Sheppard becomes the victim of McCarthy and histeria of anti-communism. Yes, I know from reading that Senator McCarthy engaged in some questionable activities accusing mainly intelectuals, Hollywood and media of membership in American Communist Party and spying for Soviets. There were victims - thousands lost their jobs, some were blacklisted, few committed suicide. Does this means that the fear of communism was unjustified? Was he right saying that American Communist Party was a spy ring for Soviets? Was the fer of communism justified? Verona papers from Moscow archives confirm this fact. Soviets penetrated American State Department, Treasury Department, American Embassy in Moscow. The closest friend of President Roosvelt- Hopkins- gave the secret of atom bomb to Soviets during the WWII. After the war the Soviets actively undermined US in South America (Cuba, Vietnam), Europe and had large espionage network. I have no objections if Mrs. Kingsolver fictionalizes history of Mexico, Aztecs, Mayan, native indigents, small towns of USA - this is her right as a writer. But if she takes up the cause of fighting against anti-communism and on the way, distorts recent history - this I find disturbing. The reviewer before me, wrote that he learned his historical facts from Lacuna - my advise - find a better source. Mrs Kingsolver seems to strive for a better world. I do to. My better world is a world without terror of Hitler, communism and Muslim terrorists. Is such world possible? Not if we just sit and watch.

Write a review

46 out of 72 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes | No

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.