The Bottom Line
Pros
- 'SuperFreakonomics' is chock full of fascinating and informative examples and anecdotes.
- The writing is witty and easy for anyone to read.
Cons
- The book makes bold conclusions that are often not thoroughly substantiated.
Description
- 'SuperFreakonomics' was published in October 2009.
- Publisher: HarperCollins
- 288 pages
Guide Review - SuperFreakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner - Book Review
Unifying this seemingly random collection of observations are the themes that incentives matter and unintended consequences are commonplace. When estate taxes are raised, old people with estates tend to die immediately before the higher taxes go into place and when taxes are lowered, they often die just after the cuts go into effect. While some may donate organs for altruistic purposes, those countries that rely on this lose thousands of lives to organ shortages, whereas those that compensate organ giving don’t have wait lists.
While fascinating, SuperFreakonomics does make conclusions on tenuous evidence. It starts with a comparison of drunk walking and drunk driving. It makes a series of assumptions and guesses, makes a few back of the envelope calculations, then concludes "a drunk walker is eight times more likely to get killed than a drunk driver." The original Freakonomics made bold claims on dubious evidence that have since been discredited. Unfortunately, SuperFreakonomics also makes claims that will likely not stand up to serious scrutiny.
SuperFreakonomics is fun, entertaining, and promotes an unusual manner of thinking. If you liked the original you will enjoy this sequel. Just don’t take its specific claims too seriously.



